thats quite the story, why do you think Harley waited so long to resurrect the concept?
Resistance from the, I will be polite here,
traditionalists. Do you remember the howls of outrage at the FXR? The frame was claimed to look "too Japanese". Ditto when the Evolution engines arrived. Resistance to the appearance of the FXR frame was so great Harley had to sacrifice frame stiffness and thus handling to sell the more traditional looking Dyna Superglide. Well, pretty soon the only rides the HD traditionalist will be pimping will be their walkers and now HD needs tack that appeals to a new generation of buyers (who cares if they ride as long they buy, right?)
Same thing with the 1979 Sportster, which featured a triangulated frame from the XLCR. Oh the horror, the cries of outrage. Function? Can't have that! By 1982 Harley had a new frame that didn't show the triangulation necessary to make a good handling bike.
Just me, but I wish old Vaughn Beals had put the company's money in the 1100 OHC and Nova rather than the Evo twins. I had cash saved for a new Nova by 1983 but the project was cancelled. I bought a BMW instead, but every time I look at the images of the faired Nova at the Harley museum I say to myself I would buy one today if Harley would just make it.